The Newsroom

---

Trenton — With no legislative involvement, New Jersey has handed control over key environmental and public health science to a politically-selected group of advisors, several of whom have industry ties, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).  As a result, Governor Chris Christie has snuffed out independent public agency science and shelved years of important scientific work on vital topics such as risk assessments for drinking water quality standards and toxic cleanup standards.

The 16-member Science Advisory Board is selected by and answers to the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).  In testimony last week on DEP’s budget, Bob Martin, the current Commissioner, says he has charged this interdisciplinary advisory board with making scientific calls on a broad portfolio of eco-issues.  Yet, despite this outsized role, the Science Advisory Board –

• Does not allow the public to attend its meetings, which occur via conference call;
• Has no posted agenda or regular schedule of meetings.  The Board last met in June 2011;
• Works only on issues put before it by the Commissioner;
• Lacks any independent review of its work products, which may or may not be published or disclosed to the public, subject to the sole discretion of the Commissioner; and
• Allows a “confidential” screening for potential conflicts-of-interest from employers or clients, again subject to the sole purview of Commissioner Martin.

“By using an essentially private advisory board, the Christie administration has put a very tight choker leash on any genuine scientific inquiry into an array of burning environmental issues,” stated New Jersey PEER Director Bill Wolfe, a former DEP analyst.  “Scientific integrity benefits from true independence, transparency, rigorous peer review, and robust public debate – all elements absent from how this Board operates.”
 
The stultifying shadow of the Science Advisory Board is already having big effects: 

• The state’s 27-year old Drinking Water Quality Institute, which determines the scientific basis of maximum contamination levels for chemicals in drinking water, has been virtually jettisoned.  In March 2009, the Institute issued a report recommending new or tighter standards for 13 chemicals but that report was shelved and its chair resigned in frustration;
• The Science Advisory Board has only produced two very narrow reports.  One of those reports, on diesel emission retrofit technology, is so opaque as to be virtually useless; and 
• Commissioner Martin indicates he plans to use the board as a tool to weaken or eliminate current standards on stream buffers and aquifer protections.

“This Advisory Board is employed as a crowbar to decouple science from the development of public health and environmental standards such that regulatory standard-setting has been completely derailed – which was likely the game plan all along,” added Wolfe, pointing out that it was outgoing Commissioner (now EPA Administrator) Lisa Jackson who eliminated the DEP Science Division as part of a Gov. Jon Corzine initiative creating the Science Advisory Board.  “By politicizing environmental science, affected industry not only has a seat at the table, it controls the table.”

                                                                   ###

                       Examine lack of transparency or process in Science Advisory Board (SAB)

New Jersey PEER is a state chapter of a national alliance of state and federal agency resource professionals working to ensure environmental ethics and government accountability